Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board v. Hickory Farms of Ohio & Liberty Mutual Insurance
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge Wilkinson,
The narrow issue in this appeal from the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Board) is whether the claimant was in the course of her employment under Section 301 of The Pennsylvania Workmen’s Compensation Act1 when she was injured off the premises of her employer. We hold that she was not.
What actually happened is not in dispute. The record shows that claimant was the manager of appellant’s store, located in an enclosed shopping mall. In addition to her supervisory duties, claimant maintained employe work schedules and reports, upon which salaries were based.
Claimant…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Rybitski v. LebowitzSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
- Rabenstein v. State Workmen's Insurance FundCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Krchmar v. Oakland Beach Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
- Ristine v. MOORESuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
3Cited by14 opinions
- Anzese v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- LoPresti v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Unity Auto Parts, Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Serafin v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Williams v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.