Myles E. Rieser Co. v. Loew's Inc.
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtNull, J.
In passing upon the extent of the privilege existing between attorney and client, the Court of Appeals has recently ruled (Bloodgood v. Lynch, 293 N. Y. 308, 314), that “ Neither the client nor the counsel may be compelled * * * to produce a document which has the status of a privileged communication between attorney and client when the privilege is claimed by the client.” Support for this conclusion is to be found in text authority (8 Wigmore on Evidence, § 2324).
It follows therefrom that the claim of privilege, properly invoked, precludes examination of either the client or the attorney…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Bloodgood v. LynchNew York Court of Appeals · 1944
- Lifchitz v. O'BrienAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1911
- Sullivan v. FranzrebAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1912
3Cited by11 opinions
- Radiant Burners, Inc., an Illinois Corporation v. American Gas Association, Peoples Gas Light and Coke CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1963
- Merrin Jewelry Co. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1970
- Dunn v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1961
- Kent Jewelry Corp. v. KieferNew York Supreme Court · 1952
- Mileski v. LockerNew York Supreme Court · 1958
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.