Legal Opinion
Moore v. Macon Coca-Cola Bottling Co.
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided February 16, 1935No. 10263PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Beck, Presiding Justice.
The Court of Appeals certified to the Supreme Court the following questions:
“1. In an action for personal injuries, in which the plaintiff charges that the defendant bottling company negligently allowed particles of glass to get into a bottle of coca-cola while the coca-cola was in the process of being bottled and capped, which particles injured the plaintiff by reason of his having drunk the contents of the bottle containing the same, is it proper for the court, on motion of counsel for the defendant, and over the objection of counsel for the plaintiff, to allow the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Springer v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1891
- Palmer Brick Co. v. ChenallSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
- City of Atlanta v. MilamSupreme Court of Georgia · 1894
- Vane v. City of EvanstonIllinois Supreme Court · 1894
- Broyles v. PrisockSupreme Court of Georgia · 1896
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. LutherCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
- MacOn Coca-Cola Bottling Co. v. ChanceySupreme Court of Georgia · 1960
- State Highway Department v. AndrusSupreme Court of Georgia · 1956
- Houston Coca-Cola Bottling Co. v. KelleyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1942
- Shahan v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1945
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.