Legal Opinion

San Mateo County Department of Social Services v. Joe P.

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 6, 1985No. A025161PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KING, J.

In this case, because due process requires that parents be afforded notice and an opportunity to be heard at a jurisdictional hearing in juvenile court dependency proceedings, we hold it is reversible error to fail to continue the hearing where counsel for an out-of-state parent was appointed by the court two days prior to the hearing and, despite reasonable efforts, had been unable to make contact with his client, since this prevented counsel from acquainting himself with the case and conferring with his client in order to prepare for the hearing. It is reversible error even…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In Re Edward C.California Court of Appeal · 1981
  2. Social Services Agency v. Larry M.California Court of Appeal · 1978

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In Re Brendan P.California Court of Appeal · 1986
  2. In Re CPCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  3. People v. Eric J.California Court of Appeal · 1988
  4. San Diego County Department of Social Services v. Bernard P.California Court of Appeal · 1986
  5. In re Anthony P. CA5California Court of Appeal · 2020

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API