Legal Opinion · Dissent

Lakeshore Motor Coach Lines, Inc. v. Salt Lake Transportation Co.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided October 22, 1968No. Nos. 10904, 10907, 10908Published

1DissentHenriod, Justice

I dissent. The main opinion apparently has abdicated from the letter and spirit of the public utilities act standards for the protection of existing carriers’ franchise rights, (as I think was the case in Prich-*425ard Transfer, Inc. v. W. S. Hatch Co., 21 Utah 2d 106, 441 P.2d 135 (1968)). Under the decision in this case and the Prichard case, a certificate of convenience and necessity, backed up by hard-earned risk capital, is valueless, and any Johnnie Come Lately prophetically but not conclusively may now say I think I can do the job cheaper, I am supported by a numerically greater number of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Prichard Transfer, Inc. v. W. S. Hatch Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API