Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Clayman v. Jung

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided June 13, 1997No. Civil Action No. 96-6793PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

DALZELL, District Judge.

This accident suit will serve as a vehicle to explain the rules governing alternative service of process under the Pennsylvania Rules of Civil Procedure.

In order to understand the procedural posture of this case and the lessons to be garnered regarding the shortcomings of alternative service by publication, we will rehearse our previous Orders in this matter.

Legal Analysis

A. December 18, 1996 Order

Plaintiffs Mr. and Mrs. dayman originally petitioned the Court for an Order, pursuant to Pennsylvania Rules of Civil Procedure 404 and 430, to permit alternative…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Deer Park Lumber, Inc. v. MajorSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  2. Romeo v. LooksSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  3. Kittanning Coal Co. v. International Mining Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1982

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Calabro v. LeinerDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2006
  2. Grove v. GuilfoyleDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2004
  3. ALLSTATE VEHICLE AND PROPERTY INSURANCE COMPANY v. TOP LINE BUILDERS, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2023
  4. COOK v. LEVITTDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2025
  5. HOF GRANTOR TRUST 1 v. WASHINGTON DEVELOPMENT LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2026

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API