Welch Foods, Inc. v. Attorney General
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam:.
Plaintiffs appeal as of right the trial court’s grant of summary disposition for the defendant and dismissal of plaintiffs’ complaint for declaratory and injunctive relief. Plaintiff had claimed that the sparkling fruit juices they produce are not subject to Michigan’s bottle law, MCL 445.571 et seq.; MSA 18.1206(11) et seq. We affirm.
Plaintiffs produce and sell fruit juices and sparkling fruit juices. The sparkling fruit juices are undiluted fruit juices that have been subjected to carbonation. Both plaintiffs bottle some of their sparkling fruit juices in 750-milliliter bottles,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- House Speaker v. State Administrative BoardMichigan Supreme Court · 1993
- Witherspoon v. GuilfordMichigan Court of Appeals · 1994
- Richmond Township v. ErbesMichigan Court of Appeals · 1992
- Newsome v. Board of State CanvassersMichigan Court of Appeals · 1976
- Markillie v. Board of County Road CommissionersMichigan Court of Appeals · 1995
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- B & B Investment Group v. GitlerMichigan Court of Appeals · 1998
- People v. ReddenMichigan Court of Appeals · 2010
- People v. NicholsonMichigan Court of Appeals · 2012
- State v. McQueenMichigan Court of Appeals · 2011
- Ter Beek v. City of WyomingMichigan Court of Appeals · 2012
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.