Consolidation Coal Co. v. Shannon
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Appeal from tlie Circuit Court for Allegany County. The facts are sufficiently given in the opinion of the Court. At the trial below, the defendant, the Canal Company offered the following prayers, of which the Court (Motter, J.) rejected the second, sixth, seventh, eighth, ninth and tenth, and granted the first, third, fourth and fifth: 1. That if the jury shall find that the paper offered in evidence, hearing date on the 13th day of April, 1865, was executed by the…
Read the full summary
Appeal from tlie Circuit Court for Allegany County. The facts are sufficiently given in the opinion of the Court. At the trial below, the defendant, the Canal Company offered the following prayers, of which the Court (Motter, J.) rejected the second, sixth, seventh, eighth, ninth and tenth, and granted the first, third, fourth and fifth: 1. That if the jury shall find that the paper offered in evidence, hearing date on the 13th day of April, 1865, was executed by the plaintiff, and the other paper offered as the general regulations, contained the general regulations therein referred to, and…
1Opinion of the CourtAlvey, J.
This was an action instituted by the appellee against the appellant, to recover for the detention of canal boats at Georgetown, and for freight. The declaration contains seven counts. The first is for money due on account stated; the second, for work done and materials furnished; the third, for demurrage of canal boats; and the fourth, fifth, sixth and seventh, are on the special contract between the parties. The pleas are, first, never indebted as alleged; second, never promised as alleged; and third, as to the fourth, fifth, sixth and seventh special counts, a special plea, setting up…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Bradstreet v. BaldwinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1814
3Cited by1 opinion
- Willing v. BozmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1879