Legal Opinion
Reality Therapy Counseling & Recovery Center, Inc. v. Davis
District Court, E.D. Louisiana
Decided September 17, 1993No. Civ. A. No. 93-558Published
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND REASONS
FELDMAN, District Judge.
Before the Court is the motion of third party plaintiffs Sandra and Kenneth E. Davis to remand. For the reasons that follow, the motion is GRANTED.
I. BACKGROUND
In February, 1991 Sandra and Kenneth Davis entered into a contract with Reality Therapy Counseling and Recovery Center, under which the Davises guaranteed payment for drug and alcohol treatment for their daughter. The contract states:
WHEREAS “Obligor” [the Davises] desires to retain the services of “Reality” to provide inpatient residential treatment for [their daughter] at Magnolia Recovery…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- American Fire & Casualty Co. v. FinnSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Memorial Hospital System v. Northbrook Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
- Carl Heck Engineers, Inc. v. Lafourche Parish Police Jury, Defendant-Third Party v. Maryland Casualty Company, Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
- Orma Gale Moore v. United Services Automobile Association, Orma Gale Moore v. United Services Automobile AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987
- Jefferson Parish Hospital District 2 v. HarveyDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1992
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.