In re Cellino
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
Respondents, Ross M. Cellino and Stephen E. Barnes, are sole shareholders and owners of Cellino and Barnes, a professional corporation, and maintain offices for the practice of law in Buffalo and Rochester. Respondents practice exclusively in the area of personal injury law. The Grievance Committee filed a petition and supplemental petition charging respondents with advancing financial assistance to clients that was unrelated to the expenses of litigation and with other misconduct.
Respondents filed an answer and supplemental answer denying material allegations of fact, and…
3Cases cited7 opinions
- In re of DondiNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- In re CohnAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- In re NearingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1962
- In re SomersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
- In re MichaelsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1954
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by11 opinions
- In re DaleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- In re RodemanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- In re GoelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- In re MitchellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- In re BarnesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.