Legal Opinion
Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion
Texas Attorney General Reports
Decided July 2, 1942No. O-4340Published
1Opinion of the Court
OFFICE OF THE ATl’ORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS AUSTIN HonorableArtle Xephens county Attorney Eopklns County SulphtzrSprlnge, Texam Dear 9lrr we have reoelvea your we quote in part .ar foUowsc 9fe would appreo the ralialtgLana..pro em, unaer the fell truateee, ana properly apprwod arintenaent. The schoel~ha6 not 0i0t3ea bar suoh purpQm, or aban- foiale ~thsreof. “. . . .* We aasum that the oontYrct& Of en&d’ 1 nt rdM valid and enroroerbleoontreeae and that the 981r@ jfqueetion in whioh you are Interested Is the effeot.of the burning of the building upon the righ08 and llabilitiee of ths partier.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Eugster & Co. v. Joseph West & Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1883
- Phelps v. School District No. 109Illinois Supreme Court · 1922
- Dallas Cooperage & Woodenware Co. v. Creston Hoop Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1926
- Clune v. School District No. 3Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1918
- Bd. of Education of City of Hugo, Choctaw v. CouchSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917