Legal Opinion

Nathan and Joanne T. Cummings v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided April 14, 1975No. 54, Docket 74-1406PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

IRVING R. KAUFMAN, Chief Judge:

The interplay of two distinct statutory schemes often gives rise to some engrossing legal questions. In this ease, we are called upon to consider the relationship of the Internal Revenue Code and the securities laws — in particular, the proper tax treatment of a payment made in satisfaction of an apparent liability under § 16(b) of the Securities Exchange Act.1 We find that the policies of both statutes support the determination of the Commissioner of Internal Revenue that § 16(b) repayments should be treated as long term capital losses, and reverse the decision…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Arrowsmith v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  2. Smolowe v. Delendo CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943
  3. Kern County Land Co. v. Occidental Petroleum Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. United States v. Skelly Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. Tank Truck Rentals, Inc. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1958

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Gibbons v. MaloneCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013
  2. Whittaker v. Whittaker Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
  3. Kolom v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 1978
  4. Aaron L. Kolom and Serita Kolom v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
  5. Gould v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1975

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API