Legal Opinion

Longfellow v. Presidente Miguel Aleman

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 2, 1974No. Civ. 31347PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CHRISTIAN, J.

Appellant Roy P. Longfellow brought this action to recover damages for injuries allegedly sustained while working aboard a ship of Mexican registry, the Presidente Miguel Aleman. The complaint set out two causes of action: a negligence claim, and a claim under the admiralty doctrine of unseaworthiness. Named as defendants were the vessel, her owner Petróleos Mexicanos, and Willamette Iron & Steel Company, the prime contractor which had engaged appellant’s employer to assist in repairing the ship. The case was tried without a jury, on the sole issue of liability. The court…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Seas Shipping Co. v. SierackiSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Foreman & Clark Corp. v. FallonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  3. The PlymouthSupreme Court of the United States · 1866
  4. Atlantic Transport Co. of W. Va. v. ImbrovekSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  5. West v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Brown v. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  2. McAdams v. McElroyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
  3. Cristanelli v. United States LinesDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1977
  4. Arthur v. Avon Inflatables, Ltd.California Court of Appeal · 1984
  5. Martin v. BakerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API