Legal Opinion

Amerada Hess Corp. v. M/T Mariam

District Court, S.D. Alabama

Decided January 19, 1982No. Civ. A. No. 80-0241-TPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

DANIEL HOLCOMBE THOMAS, District Judge.

The above-styled cause was heard by this Court without a jury and taken under submission on the 30th day of October 1981. After hearing the evidence on September 30th, and October 1, 2, and 5, 1981, examining the exhibits, pleadings and stipulations, and proposed findings of facts and conclusions of law for all parties, this Court makes the following Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law as to liability only:

FINDINGS OF FACT The Parties and Their Claims

1. The plaintiff, Amerada Hess Corporation (Hess), a Delaware…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bunge Corp. v. M/V Furness BridgeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
  2. Trade Banner Line, Inc. v. Caribbean Steamship Co., S. A., Reynolds Metals Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
  3. Sabine Towing & Transportation Co. v. St. Joe Paper Co.District Court, N.D. Florida · 1968
  4. General Construction Co. v. Isthmian Lines, Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 1966
  5. American Oil Company v. M/T LACONDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 1973

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. McNeilCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API