Legal Opinion

State v. Bush

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided February 1, 1971No. 704SC620PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BROCK, Judge.

Defendant assigns as error that the trial judge, on voir dire, would not allow defendant to cross-examine State’s witness concerning the “circumstances surrounding the testimony given to the magistrate by the affiant in obtaining a search warrant.” The record on appeal does not disclose that any question asked the State’s witness was not allowed to be answered. True, there was some discussion between defense counsel and the presiding judge concerning the nature of the cross-examination being conducted by defense counsel, and the presiding judge stated to defense counsel: “Mr.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. BasdenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970
  2. State v. MiltonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. LoganCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973
  2. State v. BandyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API