Legal Opinion

Crown Fabrics Corporation v. American Viscose Corporation

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided October 2, 1944No. 4876-4879PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HATFIELD, Associate Judge.

These are appeals in trade-mark opposition proceedings from the decision of the Commissioner of Patents, who affirmed the decisions of the Examiner of Interferences sustaining appellee’s notices of opposition and holding that appellant was not entitled to the registration of its four trade-marks “Crownfast,” “Crownperm,” “Crown-shrunk,” the word “shrunk” being disclaimed apart from the mark as shown, and a pictorial representation of a crown, each of which, according to the four applications for registration, was for use on identical goods, that is, “Cotton, Spun…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Heger Products Co. v. Polk Miller Products CorporationCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1931
  2. Malone v. Procter & Gamble Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1933

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co. v. Celanese Corp. of AmericaCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1948
  2. The Quaker Oats Company v. St. Joe Processing Company, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1956
  3. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co. v. Celanese Corp. of AmericaCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1948
  4. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co. v. Celanese Corp. of AmericaCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1948
  5. JC Hospitality v. HochbergDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API