Legal Opinion

State v. . Mumford

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 31, 1947PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarnhill, J.

The assignments of error relied on by defendant present only one question for decision: "Was the evidence offered on the charge of nonburglarious entry such as to warrant the submission of the case to the jury? The answer to this question depends upon whether proof of a breaking is essential to sustain a conviction.

Burglary is a common law offense. To warrant a conviction thereof it must be made to appear that there was a breaking and entering during the nighttime of a dwelling or sleeping apartment with intent to commit a felony therein. That the building was or was not occupied at the time…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. . McBrydeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1887
  2. State v. . ChambersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  3. State v. . DozierSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1875
  4. State v. . HughesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1882

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. State v. BellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  2. State v. GraySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  3. State v. JaynesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1995
  4. State v. WilsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  5. State v. SurlesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API