Thompson v. Pennsylvania Railroad
Supreme Court of New Jersey
On rule to show cause.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Knapp, J.
The plaintiff was the owner of two pieces of property abutting on Bridge avenue, in Camden, and dwelt in one of these premises. Through Bridge avenue the defendant has its railway line, consisting of three tracks.
The suit was brought to recover damages for alleged injury to the possession of these tenements by surrounding them with noises, noisome and offensive smokes and stenches, through the unlawful management by the defendant of its railroad.
At the trial a verdict was taken for the plaintiff, and this rule granted to show cause why that…
2Cited by9 opinions
- Angel v. Rand Express Lines, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961
- Miller v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1913
- Peer v. City of NewarkNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961
- Laing v. United New Jersey Railroad & Canal Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1892
- Glen Wall Associates v. Wall TownshipNew Jersey Tax Court · 1983
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.