Legal Opinion

Tatman v. Rochester Lodge I.O.O.F.

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided January 30, 1929No. 13,273PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcMahan, P. J.

This is an action by appellant against Rochester Lodge No. 47, I. O. O. F. and the three trustees of the lodge, to enjoin them from enforcing a resolution of the trustees relating to interments in the I. O. O. F. cemetery at Rochester. A demurrer was sustained to the complaint, hence this appeal.

The complaint alleges that appellee lodge owns a cemetery at Rochester and for more than twenty years has been and is now selling lots therein to the public for burial purposes; that there have been more than 100 lots sold in which no burials have yet been made; that for the last six years appellant…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Roanoke Cemetery Co. v. GoodwinSupreme Court of Virginia · 1903
  2. Nicolson v. DaffinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1914
  3. Chariton Cemetery Co. v. Chariton Granite WorksSupreme Court of Iowa · 1924
  4. Scott v. Lakewood Cemetery Assn.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
  5. State v. ScovilleSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1905

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Di Cristofaro v. Laurel Grove Memorial ParkNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1957
  2. Kirtley v. McClellandIndiana Court of Appeals · 1991
  3. Davisson v. Mount Moriah Cemetery Assn.Montana Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Cristofaro v. Laurel Grove Memorial ParkNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1957
  5. Kirtley v. McClellandIndiana Court of Appeals · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API