Legal Opinion

Kramer v. Arthurs & Nicholson

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 25, 1847PublishedCited by 8 opinions

In error from tlie District Court of Allegheny. Nov. 1. This was an ejectment in which the main question was, whether either Havens or Wetmore had such an interest in the land in question as could be sold by the sheriff under a judgment against them — which judgment had been assigned to Arthurs and Nicholson, who becamp the purchasers at the sheriff’s sale.

Read the full summary

In error from tlie District Court of Allegheny. Nov. 1. This was an ejectment in which the main question was, whether either Havens or Wetmore had such an interest in the land in question as could be sold by the sheriff under a judgment against them — which judgment had been assigned to Arthurs and Nicholson, who becamp the purchasers at the sheriff’s sale. In September, 1835, Halsey and nineteen others of New York, under the style of the “ Pittsburgh Land Company,” as parties of the first part, executed an indenture with Wetmore and Havens, of the other part — reciting that the parties of…

1Opinion of the CourtGibson, C. J.

In order to develope the principles of this case, it is necessary to state succinctly the facts to which they are to be applied. By the style of the Pittsburgh Land Company, the firm of Wetmore and Havens, and nineteen other shareholders, executed articles to constitute themselves a joint-stock company to deal in real estate in that city and its vicinity, which was limited, in its duration, to a period of three years; at the end of which, the investment was to be withdrawn and the profits divided. The capital stock was limited to $100,000, in shares of $5000 — one of which was subscribed by…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Allison v. Wilson's ExecutorsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1825

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Cronkrite v. TrexlerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1898
  2. Estate of OliverSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1890
  3. Thomson's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
  4. Donald v. GuyDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1903
  5. Bosler v. Sealfon Bros.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1923

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API