Legal Opinion

Berry v. Chevrolet

District Court, D. Colorado

Decided January 30, 1991No. Civ. A. No. 90-B-916Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

BABCOCK, District Judge.

By previous order in this Title VII case, I dismissed without prejudice plaintiffs’ pendent state law claims based on the discretionary authority of district courts to refuse to hear such claims. Berry v. Stevinson Chevrolet, 744 F.Supp. 1034, 1035-36 (D.Colo.1990). Before me now is plaintiffs’ motion for reconsideration. For the reasons stated below, this motion is denied.

Plaintiffs argue that the recent decision of Shaoul v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber, Inc., XIV Brief Times Rep. 1666 (Colo.App. Dec. 20, 1990), creates an “irreconcilable…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Berry v. Stevinson ChevroletDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API