County of Sherburne v. Schoen
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Todd, Justice.
Defendants appeal from an order permanently enjoining, the commissioner of corrections, and his agents from disclosing the contents of any presentence report to inmates, parolees, or probationers unless first authorized to do so by court order. We reverse.
After “considerable investigation and study,” the Minnesota Department of Corrections announced that it was adopting a new open-file policy whereby inmates at Minnesota penal institutions, parolees, and probationers were to be allowed access to the information contained in their files. Plaintiff county asserts that in put from…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Kelsey v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Kelsey v. State Ex Rel. McManusSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- Dwight W. Kelsey v. State of Minnesota Ex Rel. Frank Wood, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1977
- Northwest Publications, Inc. v. City of BloomingtonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
- Kelsey v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.