Legal Opinion
State Civil Service Commission v. Conklin
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided February 16, 1959No. 18146Published
1Opinion of the Court
335 P.2d 537 (1959)
STATE CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION of the State of Colorado et al., Plaintiff in Error,
v.
Norton C. CONKLIN, Defendant in Error.
No. 18146.
Supreme Court of Colorado, En Banc.
February 16, 1959.
Duke W. Dunbar, Atty. Gen., Frank E. Hickey, Dep. Atty. Gen., Patricia H. Maloy, Asst. Atty. Gen., for plaintiff in error.
Max P. Zall, Ronald I. Zall, Denver, for defendant in error.
HALL, Justice.
Herein we refer to plaintiff in error as the Commission, to defendant in error as Conklin, the Board of Commissioners of the Soldiers and Sailors Home as the Board, and to the Soldiers and Sailors…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Merrick Et Al. v. N. W. Halsey & Company Et Al., and the Weis Fibre Container CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Ekern v. McGovernWisconsin Supreme Court · 1913
- Rash v. AllenSuperior Court of Delaware · 1910
- McLaughlin v. Mayor of CambridgeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1925
- Board of County Commissioners v. SalardinoSupreme Court of Colorado · 1957
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.