Legal Opinion
King v. Terwilliger
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided May 8, 1940PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtTaylor, J.
The plaintiffs — in nine actions brought against the defendant to recover for personal injuries and property damage alleged to have resulted from a collision between two automobiles — appeal from orders requiring their attorney to accept service of unverified answers in each action, which answers had been previously served upon the attorney for the plaintiffs and by him returned to the defendant’s attorney because they were unverified.
*438Each complaint alleges that the automobile in which plaintiffs were riding was proceeding southerly on Route 16 and was struck by an automobile owned and…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Thompson v. McLaughlinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1910
- Chapman v. . SeloverNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
- Travelers Insurance v. MulliganAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1931
- Meyer v. Virginius St. Julian MayoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1916
- Friess v. New York Central & H. R. RailroadNew York Supreme Court · 1893
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Knight v. MaybeeNew York Supreme Court · 1964
- John Manners & Co. v. SohnenNew York Supreme Court · 1954
- Gullo v. Courtright, New York County Courts1970