Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

In Re Marriage of Hartley

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided January 17, 1995No. 93SC625Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partJustice Lohr

The majority holds that the interests of a minor child who is the subject of a custody dispute incident to a dissolution of marriage proceeding are adequately protected by an attorney appointed by the court under section 14-10-116, 6B C.R.S. (1987). Accordingly, as I understand the majority opinion, a minor has no right to be represented by his or her own counsel, and a trial court has no discretion to permit such representation. I agree that the issue is not moot, see maj. op. part II, and that a minor child does not have the right to participate through the child’s own counsel in every…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In Re the Marriage of LesterColorado Court of Appeals · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API