State v. Epps

Decision

T1 Justin A. Epps appeals his conviction after a jury trial of violation of a protective order, a class A misdemeanor. We affirm.

T2 Epps argues that the district court erred in denying his motion for a directed verdict, claiming that the State failed to present sufficient evidence that he was the person named in the protective order or that the place of business that Epps was restrict ed from visiting was located in Heber City, Utah, within the jurisdiction of the district court. The analysis of a claim that the district court erred in denying a motion for directed verdict involves…