Legal Opinion

Steckler v. Continental Oil Co.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided June 3, 1963No. 5866PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

LANDRY, Judge.

Plaintiff, a member of the bar of this state, instituted this action against defendant seeking damages and attorney’s fees for the alleged breach of a contract wherein defendant engaged the services of plaintiff in the latter’s professional capacity. The trial court rejected plaintiff’s demands and plaintiff has appealed.

The single issue presented by this appeal is simply a matter of interpretation of the terms of the contract and agreement entered into by appellant and appellee. Notwithstanding there is absolutely no dispute between the litigants concerning the circumstances…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hunter Co. v. McHughSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1942
  2. Cooley v. Meridian Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1940
  3. Boisseau v. Vallon & Jordano, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1932
  4. CARDOS EX REL. CARDOS v. CristadoroSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1955
  5. Chicago Mill & Lumber Co. v. LewisLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1953

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Monsur v. ChaddickLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API