Croft v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Muscatine District Court. — 'Hon. D. Y. Jackson, Judge. Action to recover damages growing out of a railway accident. From a judgment in favor of plaintiff the defendant appeals.—
1Opinion of the Court
Bishop, J.\
The accident out of which this action arose is the same as that upon which the case of Laura M. Croft v. Railway, 132 Iowa, 687, was based. The general circumstances of the accident are related in the opinion in that case, and we need not here repeat. This plaintiff was the *414station agent of the defendant at Buffalo, and the husband of said Laura M. Croft. The facts of Mrs. Croft’s injury will be remembered, and the additional fact may now be stated that the minor child of the Crofts, a girl about six years of age, who had gone into the office of the depot with her mother, was…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Pomponio v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1895
- Thomas v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul RailwaySupreme Court of Iowa · 1897
- Kuhns v. Wisconsin, Iowa & Nebraska Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1887
- Nichols' Adm'r v. W. O. & W. R. R.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1887
- State v. DexterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1901
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- State v. PeirceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1916
- Castner v. WrightSupreme Court of Iowa · 1964
- Chicago Great Western Ry. Co. v. BeecherCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1945
- Mann v. Des Moines Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1942
- Ott v. MurphySupreme Court of Iowa · 1913
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.