Bailey v. Golburgh
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtSpalding, J.
In this action of tort the jury returned a verdict for the plaintiff on the first and second1 counts and the case is here on the defendant’s exception to the denial of his motion for a directed verdict.
The jury could have found the following facts: In July, 1943, the plaintiff became a tenant at will of the owner of an apartment house numbered 95 Gordon Street in the Allston district of Boston. In September of that year the defendant became the owner of the premises and the plaintiff continued to occupy them as a tenant at will. At the entrance to the premises is a porch or vestibule, and…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Erickson v. BuckleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1918
- Nash v. WebberMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1910
- Silver v. CushnerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
- Rogers v. Dudley Realty Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
- McNeill v. Home Savings BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
3Cited by5 opinions
- Falden v. GordonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1955
- Crea v. StunzenasMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1962
- Valade v. City of SpringfieldMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1979
- Menard v. TessierMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1952
- Toussaint v. Contributory Retirement Appeal BoardMassachusetts Superior Court · 2008