Arndt v. Hosford
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Harrison District Court. — Hon. C. II. Lewis, Judge. ' Action to recover an amount alleged to be due for services rendered by the plaintiff as an attorney. There was a trial by jury, and a verdict and judgment in favor of plaintiff, from which he appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtRobinson, J.
The plaintiff claims that he rendered services as an attorney for and at the request and for the benefit of Hattie Hosford, in two actions specified, and that such services were reasonably worth' the sum of four hundred dollars. Judgments were rendered in each action in favor of Mrs. Hosford, and a lien for the amount due the plaintiff was secured in the manner provided by section 215 of the Code. For the purpose of releasing such lien, the defendant, Hattie Hosford, as principal, and defendants, Reuben Newton and E. Puddy, as sureties, executed a bond, as provided by section 216 of the Code,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Head v. HargraveSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Stevens v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
- Linden v. GreenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1890
3Cited by11 opinions
- Campbell v. Wyoming Development Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1940
- Fowle v. ParsonsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1913
- Moore v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1911
- Hull v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1897
- Chicago, Anamosa & Northern Railway Co. v. WhitneySupreme Court of Iowa · 1909
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.