Legal Opinion

State v. One 2013, Toyota Corolla

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided October 28, 2015No. 2014AP2226Published

1Opinion of the CourtGundrum, J.

¶ 1. Steven T. Baumgard and Gladys A. Vogel appeal from the circuit court's order of forfeiture of the above-captioned 2013 Toyota Corolla. Defendants argue forfeiture of the Toyota pursuant to *586Wis. Stat. § 961.55 (2013-14)1 is improper because (1) Vogel is an innocent owner of it under the statute and (2) forfeiture violates the Excessive Fines Clause of the Eighth Amendment to the United States Constitution. We conclude the circuit court correctly determined the innocent owner exception to forfeiture does not apply to Vogel. We further conclude forfeiture of the Toyota and Baumgard's…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. United States v. BajakajianSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  2. United States v. ONE 1981 DATSUN 280ZXDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1983
  3. United States v. One 1971 Porsche Coupe Automobile, Vehicle Identification Number 9111100355District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1973
  4. Von Hofe v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
  5. State v. JohnsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 2007

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API