Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Liberty Mutual Insurance Co. v. Shoemake

Court of Appeals of Mississippi

Decided May 29, 2012No. 2011-CA-00179-COAPublished

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partIrving, P.J.

¶33. I agree with the majority that Mississippi’s workers’ compensation law governs this case. However, I disagree with the majority that Liberty Mutual should be reimbursed the full amount of the workers’ compensation benefits that it paid Shoemake. I believe that Liberty Mutual should be reimbursed the amount that it paid minus a pro rata share of the costs of the prosecution of the civil case against the third-party tortfeasor. Therefore, I dissent. In my judgment, the circuit court reached the right result, even though it erred in finding that Alabama’s workers’ compensation law applied.

¶…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Owen & Galloway v. Travelers Insurance Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API