Legal Opinion

Barclay Woolen Corp. v. W. E. Hulton Dyeing Co.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided August 7, 1963No. Civ. A. No. 32221PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BODY, District Judge.

Plaintiff is defendant’s lessee under a written lease dated December 15, 1961. Plaintiff, in addition to the lessor, W. E. Hulton Dyeing Co., has sued lessor’s contractor, John J. Rys, individually and trading as J. J. Rys Roofing Company (Rys), for damage to goods allegedly resulting from faulty roof repairs. Defendant-lessor has moved for summary judgment based on exculpatory clauses in the lease. Plaintiff-lessee has secured a default against Rys for failure to answer. Defendant-lessor asserts a cross-claim against Rys.

On March 6 and 7, 1962 a rainstorm damaged part of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cannon v. BreschSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  2. Bogutz v. MargolinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  3. Adler v. SklaroffSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
  4. Bryans v. GallagherSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Speer v. BarrySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  2. Chavis v. Lau, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1993
  3. Speer v. BarrySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API