Legal Opinion

Beaver v. Cravens

High Court of American Samoa

Decided August 6, 1993No. CA No. 72-90Published

1Opinion of the Court

Defendant W. Scott Barrett scheduled a deposition of defendant William Cravens for August 9, 1993, in Logan, Utah. Plaintiff Beaver admits receiving notice of this deposition on August 3. In response to the scheduled deposition, plaintiff filed a motion for a stay of the deposition and for expedited hearing and notice on August 4, 1993. For the following reasons, plaintiff’s motion is denied.

First, "the deposition-discovery rules are to be accorded a broad and liberal treatment" in order to accomplish the purposes of discovery. Dollar v. Long Mfg., N.C., Inc., 561 F.2d 613, 616 (5th Cir.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Sarah Helen Williams Dollar v. Long Mfg., N. C., Inc., and Third-Party v. Nichols Tractor Company, Inc., Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
  3. Sheftelman v. Standard Metals Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
  4. Radio Corp. of America v. Rauland Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1957
  5. Pinkham v. PaulDistrict Court, D. Maine · 1981

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API