Graham v. American Casualty Co. of Reading
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Opinion
ON REHEARING
We granted rehearing in this case as to both parties and restricted our consideration to matters contained in the record and in briefs and arguments previously submitted.
Plaintiffs-appellants reurge their argument that the pro rata clause in each of the three policies issued by Southern Farm Bureau to the Grahams should not be invoked so as to reduce the liability under each policy by two-thirds. Such clauses, it is contended, are mutually repugnant and should be read out of the contracts. We are not persuaded that the reasoning in our original opinion was erroneous in that…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Fish v. MartinLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1967
- Fruge v. American Service Mutual InsuranceLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1969