Legal Opinion

Graham v. American Casualty Co. of Reading

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided November 16, 1970No. 8073Published

1Opinion

ON REHEARING

We granted rehearing in this case as to both parties and restricted our consideration to matters contained in the record and in briefs and arguments previously submitted.

Plaintiffs-appellants reurge their argument that the pro rata clause in each of the three policies issued by Southern Farm Bureau to the Grahams should not be invoked so as to reduce the liability under each policy by two-thirds. Such clauses, it is contended, are mutually repugnant and should be read out of the contracts. We are not persuaded that the reasoning in our original opinion was erroneous in that…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Fish v. MartinLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1967
  2. Fruge v. American Service Mutual InsuranceLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API