Legal Opinion

Chow v. Clark County Sheriff's Dept.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 28, 1997No. 96-16645Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

112 F.3d 515

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.

Esther K. CHOW, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

CLARK COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, CIVIL BUREAU; Jerry

Keller, Sheriff; Steve Gibson, Deputy Sheriff; Bernie P.

Raymond, Deputy Sheriff; Ms. Brenda, Sheriff's Clerk;

Callister & Reynolds, Law Firm; Ronald H. Reynolds,

Attorney; Michael J. Harker, Attorney; Lionel, Sawyer &

Collins, Law Firm;…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Truck Insurance Exchange v. TetzlaffDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 1988
  2. Borders Electronic Co., Inc. v. QuirkNevada Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Brion v. Union Plaza Corp.Nevada Supreme Court · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API