Legal Opinion

Cahill v. Biddle

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided June 5, 1926No. 7100PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MUNGER, District Judge.

Appellants were indicted in the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of Illinois for violations of the Act of Congress approved Eehruary 13, 1913 (Comp. St. § 8603). In five different counts of this indictment it was alleged that they broke the seal of or entered into railroad cars containing interstate shipments of freight, with intent to commit larceny in the car, that they did commit such larceny and that they unlawfully had possession of the goods stolen from such shipments of freight, knowing them tp have been stolen. The goods were…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Ponzi v. FessendenSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  2. Ex Parte Bollman and SwartwoutSupreme Court of the United States · 1807
  3. In Re BonnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  4. MedleySupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  5. Pierce v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Ex Parte SheplyNevada Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Bonner v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1931
  3. Buhler v. HillDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1934
  4. Caballero v. HudspethDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1941
  5. Gorsuch v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1929

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API