Legal Opinion

Parfait, Hal Vernon

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided November 12, 2003No. PD-1786-02Published

1Opinion of the Court 1

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. 1786-02

HAL VERNON PARFAIT, Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

ON APPELLANT'S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

FROM THE FIRST COURT OF APPEALS

BRAZOS COUNTY

2Opinion of the Court · KeaslerKeasler, J.

O P I N I O N

Hal Vernon Parfait was convicted of indecency with a child by exposure and attempted aggravated sexual assault of a child. The trial court ordered his sentences to run consecutively under section 3.03(b)(2)(A) of the Penal Code. (1) The Court of Appeals affirmed. (2) We granted review to determine whether the Court of Appeals erred in interpreting section 3.03(b)(2)(A) as including attempted…

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Boykin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
  2. Jones v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
  3. Parfait v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API