Legal Opinion

Beaver Reclamation Oil Co. v. Railroad Commission

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 4, 1938No. 8544; Motion No. 8790Published

1Opinion

On Appellee’s Motion for Rehearing.

In view of appellee’s statement in its motion to the effect that until the decision of this court was rendered it was not aware that it was required to controvert statements in appellant’s brief, we deem it proper to direct attention to Court of Civil Appeals Rule 31 with reference to briefing. This rule requires the appellant to make “a clear and accurate statement of the record bearing upon the respective propositions.” The rule further provides: “If the statement from the record thus made is not distinctly challenged by the opposing party, it may be…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Davenport v. Railroad CommissionCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935
  2. Rd. Commission of Texas v. MorganCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936
  3. Davenport v. Railroad CommissionCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935
  4. Davenport v. Railroad CommissionCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936
  5. Railroad Commission v. PattonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API