Legal Opinion

Kirk v. Ashley

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided April 3, 1991No. A91A0071PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Andrews, Judge.

The Kirks appeal from the grant of defendant’s motion for summary judgment in their medical malpractice action against Dr. Ashley. In the complaint’s only specification of negligence, Thomas Kirk and his wife, Modena, claimed that Dr. Ashley, while performing surgery on Mr. Kirk for a hiatal hernia, lacerated his liver and severed his hepatic vein.

The evidence established that the tears during Mr. Kirk’s operation at Walton County Hospital resulted in significant bleeding and Dr. Ashley halted the operation with respect to the hiatal hernia, gave him blood and transferred him…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Howard v. WalkerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1978
  2. Loving v. NashCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1987
  3. Jones v. RodzewiczCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
  4. Jackson v. GershonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1983
  5. Beauchamp v. WallaceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1986

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. First Chatham Bank v. Liberty Capital, LLCCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2014
  2. Flowers v. ArmstrongCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1991
  3. First Chatham Bank v. Liberty Capital, LLCCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2014
  4. Postell v. Trinitec Portfolio Services, LLCCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2017
  5. Ridley v. SOVEREIGN SOLUTIONS, LLCCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API