Legal Opinion

Duran v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided July 23, 2009No. 45A03-0811-CR-569PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ROBB, Judge.

Case Summary and Issue

Luis Duran brings this interlocutory appeal following the trial court's denial of his motion to suppress evidence seized during a search of his apartment. On appeal, Duran raises one issue, which we restate as whether the trial court properly concluded that the police officers' entry into Duran's apartment did not violate the Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution or Article I, Section 11, of the Indiana Constitution. Concluding the trial court's decision was not improper, we affirm.

Facts and Procedural History

On the afternoon of March 4,…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Whren v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. United States v. United States District Court for the Eastern District of MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Steagald v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Duran v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Duran v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Duran v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API