Legal Opinion · Dissent

People's National Bank v. Duchamp

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided December 3, 1973No. 4387Published

1Dissent

FRUGÉ, Judge

(dissenting).

It is my belief that the majority of this court has fallen into error in reaching their decision, and for this reason I strongly dissent.

The note is not simply a note payable on demand, but is apparently a note form normally utilized as a hand note in accordance with a collateral mortgage. The note’s terms entail the following: the note was executed at New Iberia, Louisiana, on February 2, 1964, for the sum of $29,400.00. It further states that “On Demand months after date we in solido promise to pay to the order of the People’s National Bank of New Iberia, Louisiana,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. SFC Acceptance Corp. v. SpainSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API