Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. Kinney

U.S. Army Court of Military Review

Decided July 28, 1986No. CM 447921PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

CARMICHAEL, Judge:

The confinement portion of appellant’s sentence was for a term of four years and seven months. Pursuant to the terms of a pretrial agreement, the convening authority approved the sentence and ordered it executed, but suspended for a period of 36 months the execution of that portion of the confinement exceeding 36 months.

Appellant asserts that the convening authority erred to his substantial prejudice by acting to suspend a portion of his confinement for a period longer than two years. Although mindful that this court recently held that a general…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. VoorheesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954
  2. United States v. BlairU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1986
  3. United States v. AllenUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1983
  4. United States v. ShearerU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1986
  5. United States v. WilliamsonU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1984

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. United States v. LeonardU S Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals · 1995
  2. United States v. RatliffNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 1995
  3. United States v. CabbleU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1993
  4. United States v. JonesU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1987
  5. United States v. GurganiousU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1993

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API