Legal Opinion

E. H. Smith and Son v. Springdale Mall

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 10, 1992No. 1901150PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

A third-party defendant, E.H. Smith and Son Electrical Contractors, Inc. ("Smith"), suffered a default judgment in the amount of $250,820.11. Smith moved for relief from the judgment under Rule 60(b)(1) and (6), A.R.Civ.P.; the trial court denied the motion. Smith appealed. We reverse and remand.

On March 19, 1989, an accident occurred at the Springdale Mall Shopping Center ("Springdale"), in Mobile, Alabama. In a resulting lawsuit the plaintiffs alleged that Joseph William Joyave, a minor, was holding onto an iron fence enclosing a metal lamppost when the iron post and fence fell over and…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lee v. MartinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1988
  2. Sanders v. WeaverSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991
  3. Menefee v. VealSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986
  4. Wiggins v. Tuscaloosa Warehouse Groceries, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1981
  5. Wise v. Louisiana-Pacific Corp.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1988

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Progress Industries, Inc. v. WilsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 2010
  2. Chamblee v. DuncanCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2015
  3. R.D.B. v. State Department of Human Resources ex rel. R.A.P.B.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1994
  4. Gilliam v. Western Auto Supply Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1998
  5. Gilliam v. Western Auto Supply Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API