Legal Opinion
Rash v. Zurbrick
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided March 13, 1935No. 6781PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MOORMAN, Circuit Judge.
The appellant is an alien as defined in the Immigration Acts of 1917 (section 1) and 1924 (section 28). 39 Stat. 874, 43 Stat, 168, 8 USCA §§ 173, 224. Being in the United States on July 2, 1932, he departed to make a visit in Canada, intending to return at the expiration of his visit. Three days later he presented himself at the port of Detroit and applied for readmission as a returning alien. There was no record of his original admission, and he did not have an unexpired immigration visa or a re-entry permit. He was given a hearing on his application before a board of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
- Fong Yue Ting v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- The Japanese Immigrant CaseSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Nishimura Ekiu v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Low Wah Suey v. BackusSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Zacharias v. McGrathDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1952
- United States Ex Rel. Trinler v. CarusiCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1948
- United States Ex Rel. Trinler v. CarusiCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1948