In re York Silk Mfg. Co.
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
In the matter of the York Silk Manufacturing Company, bankrupt. Heard on exceptions to report of referee disallowing claims of the Commonwealth. The following is the referee’s report: Claims of Commonwealth.
Read the full summary
In the matter of the York Silk Manufacturing Company, bankrupt. Heard on exceptions to report of referee disallowing claims of the Commonwealth. The following is the referee’s report: Claims of Commonwealth. On October 20, 1910, the Auditor General filed a claim for $18,806.67. The proof is made up as follows: (1) Bonus on increase of capital stock, August 1st, 1903, Vs of 1 per cent, on $3,200.00. $10,666.67 Settled and entered by Auditor General and approved by State Treasurer October 19, 1910. Interest claimed from June 25, 1904, at rate of 6 per cent, per annum. „ (2) Penalty for neglect…
1Opinion of the Court
WITMER, District Judge.
After hearing the argument of counsel, reading and considering the opinion filed by j. Edward Vander-sloot, Esq., referee, the exceptions thereto and the record in this case, it is, upon consideration, adjudged and decreed that the findings of the referee in favor of the trustee and general creditors disallowing the claim of the commonwealth, as preferred, and in rejecting the claim for penalties, are in accordance with the law, and the referee’s conclusions and order are affirmed.
The well-considered opinion of the learned referee is adopted as the opinion, conclusions,…
2Cited by8 opinions
- Nolte v. Hudson Nav. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1925
- Pennsylvania v. York Silk Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1911
- In Re Messenger's Merchants Lunch RoomsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1936
- United Gas Improv. Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1932
- People of Illinois ex rel. Ames v. OppenheimerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1936
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.