Legal Opinion

In re Pearce

United States District Court

Decided July 1, 1843PublishedCited by 12 opinions

This was a petition by Alonzo Pearce, a bankrupt, one of the partners of the firm of Walbridge, Pearce & Co., for a discharge. The material facts in the case are sufficiently detailed in the opinion delivered by the court.

1Opinion of the CourtPrentiss, J.

The objections filed in this case by the opposing creditors, although somewhat multifarious as well as numerous, may be classed under two general heads; — 1, That the bankrupt has not made a full disclosure of his property in his schedule, but has fraudulently concealed property; — 2, That he has given unlawful preferences to particular creditors by certain payments, securities, and transfers of property. These two general objections seem to comprise the whole case, as presented by the proofs.

I. Under the first head of objections, the concealment of property, an argument was urged with much…

2Cited by12 opinions

  1. Milavetz, Gallop & Milavetz, P. A. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  2. Curtis and Others v. . LeavittNew York Court of Appeals · 1857
  3. Hersh v. United States Ex Rel. MukaseyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2008
  4. Buckingham v. McLeanSupreme Court of the United States · 1852
  5. Utley v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1855

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API