Legal Opinion
State ex rel. Rantz v. Sweeney
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided June 15, 1995No. 20069PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PARRISH, Judge.
Relators seek to prohibit the respondent circuit judge from quashing a notice to take depositions in a condemnation action brought by Missouri Highway & Transportation Commission (MHTC).1 Relators own real estate that is part of the land MHTC seeks to condemn.
Relators filed a motion to dismiss the condemnation action. The motion to dismiss challenges, among other things, MHTC’s authority to condemn parts of the land in question. Relators argue that some of the land sought is intended for uses other than those for which MHTC has authority to condemn; that MHTC’s use of the power…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Plank v. KoehrSupreme Court of Missouri · 1992
- State Ex Rel. Houser v. GoodmanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1966
- Bethell v. PorterMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980
- State Ex Rel. Weatherby Advertising Co. v. ConleySupreme Court of Missouri · 1975
- State Ex Rel. State Highway Commission v. HammelSupreme Court of Missouri · 1956
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Aaron v. Target CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2004
- City of Wentzville v. DodsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 2004
- City of Kansas City, Missouri v. Telester Ameena PowellMissouri Court of Appeals · 2014
- State ex rel. Missouri Highway & Transportation Commission v. BushMissouri Court of Appeals · 1995
- Jeffrey S. Aaron v. City of St. Louis MOCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2004