Cleveland R. Co. v. Commissioner
United States Board of Tax Appeals
1. The City of Cleveland, Ohio, by ordinance and regulations provided a scale of fare to be charged by petitioner predicated upon a net return to petitioner each year of an amount sufficient to pay a dividend of 6 per cent upon its capital stock.
Read the full summary
1. The City of Cleveland, Ohio, by ordinance and regulations provided a scale of fare to be charged by petitioner predicated upon a net return to petitioner each year of an amount sufficient to pay a dividend of 6 per cent upon its capital stock. The plan in substance was that if the net return to petitioner in any year exceeded a fixed amount, the rate of fare to be charged the public for the succeeding year was automatically reduced, and if the return in any year failed to equal the fixed return the fare was automatically increased for the succeeding year. The City of Cleveland did not own…
1Opinion of the Court
CLEVELAND RAILWAY CO., PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT.
Cleveland R. Co. v. Commissioner
Docket Nos. 10537, 12535.
United States Board of Tax Appeals
10 B.T.A. 310; 1928 BTA LEXIS 4145;
January 27, 1928, Promulgated
1. The City of Cleveland, Ohio, by ordinance and regulations provided a scale of fare to be charged by petitioner predicated upon a net return to petitioner each year of an amount sufficient to pay a dividend of 6 per cent upon its capital stock. The plan in substance was that if the net return to petitioner in any year exceeded a fixed amount, the rate of…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Cleveland R. Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1928