State v. Owens
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
WHICHARD, Judge.
G.S. 15A-1232 provides, in pertinent part: “In instructing the jury, the judge must declare and explain the law arising on the evidence. He is not required to state the evidence except to the extent necessary to explain the application of the law [thereto].” Defendant argues that the court here failed to give any summary of the evidence and that “no summary of the evidence at all is insufficient to explain the application of the law [thereto].”
Defendant, however, did not object to this omission before the jury retired. He thus has waived his right to assign error thereto. Rule…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State v. FinchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
- State v. BestSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
- State v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
- State v. BryantCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. EasonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
- State v. MaynardCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
- State v. NorfleetCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
- State v. EasonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984